Albert Hollan
For District Judge
Q-What office are you running for?

A-District Judge, 434th District.  This is a new court that was created last year.  Governor Perry appointed the first judge, but you will get to elect the next one.

Q-Where is the court?

A-The court sits in Richmond, but the district is the whole county.

Q-Didn't you run before?

A-Yes, I ran for the 400th District Court and received 43% of the vote in November 2004.  I ran for the 268th District Court and received almost 45% of the vote in November 2006.

Q-What is your political affiliation?

A-Democratic.

Q-Why?

A-I think politics should be driven from the bottom-up and not top-down.  The Democratic Party tends to attract independent thinkers who value privacy and individual rights.  I value both.

Q-Do you have a family?

A-Yes, my wife and I have been married for 20 years.  We have been blessed with two kids (a daughter and a son).

Q-What is your religious affiliation?

A-Methodist.

Q-Why are you running for this office?

A-I want to serve our community as a judge.  I believe there is no higher calling for a lawyer than to take his (or her) experiences to the bench and help make the justice system operate just a bit better. 

Q-How long would you serve?

A-District Judges are elected for four year terms, after which they may run for re-election.

Q-What kind of cases does this court handle?

A-This is a court of general jurisdiction, which means that it handles both criminal and civil cases.

Q-Isn't it true that you are a civil lawyer and not a criminal lawyer?

A-Yes, I am a board certified civil trial lawyer, certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.  However, before I was certified and early in my career, I handled a wide variety of cases, including traffic ticket defense in the municipal courts, juvenile defense, and criminal defense in the county courts.  I found that I preferred representing clients in civil cases, rather than criminal cases, but that will not hamper me in presiding over criminal cases.

Q-Why is the justice system so messed up?

A-I don't agree with that.  For the most part, our justice system works well.  Having said that, there are some improvements that can and should be made.  Most of them will have to occur in the state legislature.  In terms of civil justice, too many restrictions and barriers have been raised to prevent citizens from getting a full recovery for damages to them or to their property.  Even worse, mandatory arbitration provisions in contracts can prevent citizens from ever having their day in court.  In terms of criminal justice, we are filling our jails and prisons with people who are addicted to alcohol, drugs, or who are mentally ill.  There is an economic cost as we have to pay to build more and more jails.  There is a social cost as we have increasing numbers of young men and women who have a criminal record, thus making it harder to obtain and retain a job.  Prisons should be used to lock up those who are dangerous to the rest of us.  Those who are not could be diverted to community supervision programs.

Q-What is your position on abortion, gay marriage, and the pledge of allegiance?

A-The pledge of allegiance is required in schools by the state legislature, gay marriage is prohibited by the Texas Constitution, and abortion for adult women is legal without restriction in the first trimester.  In other words, my position on these issues is to obey the Texas and U.S. Constitutions, and follow the law.

Q-Will you legislate from the bench?

A-No, the legislature in Austin legislates.  That is not my role.

Q-What is your position on toll roads?

A-I am not allowed to state a position on matters that may come before the 434th District Court, and since there may be litigation about the Trans Texas Corridor as well as local toll roads, I must respectfully decline to state an opinion.

Q-Why are you running against Jim Shoemake?

A-I am running for the 434th District Court, not against Judge Shoemake.  That may seem like a distinction without a difference, but I would be running for this office whether he was the judge or not.  James Shoemake was an unelected Associate Judge in the family court when he was appointed to this court last year by Governor Perry.  He has not been elected.  We are both running to be elected.

Q-Why shouldn't I just vote for Shoemake?

A-You can, but if you have been watching the local newspapers, you will know that Judge Shoemake is currently under investigation by the Texas Ethics Commission.  In another instance, he was accused by a litigant of engaging in ex parte communications with the other party in a contested case.  A judge from Galveston was brought in to hear the litigant's Motion to Recuse Judge Shoemake and the motion was granted.  In a different case, a lawyer filed a Motion to Recuse Judge Shoemake because the judge's wife was hired to work in the District Clerk's office at the courthouse.  Because the prosecutor was married to the District Clerk, that put the lawyer in the awkward position of defending a case where the judge's wife worked for the prosecutor's wife.

Q-Do you have any conflicts of interest at the courthouse?

A-No.  I do not have have any relatives working at the courthouse, the District Attorney's office, or in the Sheriff's Department.


If you have a question, send an e-mail and a reply will be posted here.

 

 

 

 

Political ad paid for by the Albert Hollan Campaign.